離開
進入o homem que mudou o jogo resumo
o homem que mudou o jogo resumo
and theyre terrprognóstico para hojeible (not much has changed).
In fact the single thread performance of the 980X was 8% slower than the 2200G and 17% slower once the APU is overclocked.Blender is another application that empprognóstico para hojeloys AVX instructions and like what we saw with V-Ray the Core i7-980X really suffers due to its lack of AVX support.
So lets see how Intels first 6-core desktop CPU stacks up in 2018.the plucky little quad-core was still 3% faster.less than half that of the 980X.prognóstico para hoje
the 32nm parts are a bit special in the sense that they pack six cores.youre looking at having to pony up around $100 - $150 for an X58 motherboard and the better examples.
so the 980X is going to lag behind severely in workloads that take advantage of AVX instructions.
Ignoring the AVX workloads the 980X was 37% faster than the 2200G in Cinebench R15s multithreaded test when comparing out of the box performance.it was a baffling move by Blizzards management.
Theyve told me about a canceled second expansion for Diablo III.Screenshot: KotakuBlizzard appears to be bolstering headcount for its development teams---one current developer said their team was encouraged to get bigger---while cutting as many costs as possible elsewhere.
Blizzards digital store now sells games made by other Activision studios.Not only had they wasted resources on this failed game---everybody knew about it.
